Jobs Applied: Tolerate Only ‘A’ Players

Steve Jobs, despite all of his redeeming features, was famously ‘impatient, petulant and tough with the people around him”. He also delivered results, while maintaining a loyal cadre of high achievers that stayed with him much longer than was typical of the computer industry at the time.

“CEOs who study Jobs and decide to emulate his toughness without understanding his ability to generate loyalty make a dangerous mistake”. - Walter Isaacson

Jobs believed that part of his job was to unfailingly deliver the brutal truth, rather than sugar coat failures. His belief was that many organizations employ managers who are so polite and forgiving as to become ineffective, allowing mediocre employees to feel comfortable and thus encouraging them to stay.

Jack Welch, famed CEO of GE had a similar style and philosophy when it came to an intolerance for mediocrity. Indeed, Jim Collins, in ‘Good to Great‘ found that one of the key features of great companies is that they were good at ‘getting the right people on the bus’. Along with that inevitably comes the need to get the wrong people off of the bus. GE famously utilized a performance feedback system that systematically ensured that the bottom 10% of employees were terminated or rehabilitated… slowly raising the bar for all employees.

Leaders and managers in physical therapy practices attempt to hire the strongest clinicians, with an attitude that lends itself great customer service and teamwork. This gets more difficult in tight job markets or when timing limits our choices. The adage of ‘hire slow, fire fast‘ is often harder to do than we like, and it goes without saying that the best time to ensure we have the right people on the bus is during the hiring process. We occasionally hire someone that isn’t a good fit (a C or D player). These are difficult enough to deal with. Even harder than the obviously insufficient are those that are ‘OK’, the B players.26325920_s

By tolerating ‘B players’ we prevent the opportunity for an A player to join our team. True - we can develop B players into A players… but when you determine that they are a B player with no potential, they can set the bar for everyone around them. A team member’s status as a A or B or C doesn’t have to be defined only by phenomenal clinical skills, or amazing personality or steadfast work ethic… although it could mean any or all of those things. We should employ good clinicians with great empathy and a strong work ethic. We should employ great clinicians with good customer service skills and great ability to teach others. We should employ resilient, gritty grinders that never complain and make sure that the work gets done. But we should never tolerate mediocre clinicians with an OK attitude that give us no reason to complain.

How we deal with professionals that ‘meet standards’ or are ‘good enough’ determines whether our practice is doomed to mediocrity or if it has the capacity to be great. Tolerate only A players.

Please note: I reserve the right to delete comments that are offensive or off-topic.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

4 thoughts on “Jobs Applied: Tolerate Only ‘A’ Players

  1. Reality…. I have a feeling the majority of companies focus on a hot body reaching X productivity. In all the various positions I have been with in my local area, the majority just want someone to get a job done. And… if you are an A player, it is extremely frustrating practicing in that environment. You’ll be the target of negativity for expecting too much. You’ll also be chastized for believing the bar can be raised. Cultures of mediocrity exist… there are no seats on the bus for A players in that environment.

      • I like that reversal, David. I have felt before that I didn’t want to be a leader somewhere because there wasn’t anyone to inspire ME. A bit like not wanting to join a club who will accept my membership application, isn’t it?

        • Great comment, Kristen! I do think there is something to believing in what you are doing, the ‘WHY’, in order to be at our most effective as leaders. Fortunately, there is always a good ‘why’ in physical therapy. If we can tack our willingness to lead to our patients rather than perhaps a charismatic leader that motivating force will follow us throughout our career.